Abstract:
This research intends to evaluate the importance and satisfaction level oftourists in regard to the environmental service quality offered by marine parks, namely Tioman Island Marine Park
(TIMP), Redang Island Marine Park (RIMP), and Payar Island Marine Park (PIMP). The measurement of importance and satisfaction is based on mean analysis of both the importance mean (estimated/
expected mean) and perceived mean (satisfaction mean). The difference between these mean values signifiesgap value. In explaining the existenceofdifference, the gap analysis in this researchis assisted by the paired t-test analysis. If the result is significant, this indicates that the tourists get what they
expected from their visits. However, ifthe result is not significant, it must be ascertained as to whether their visits fulfilled their expectations or otherwise. Research results show that all tourists express the importance ofand satisfaction towards the environmental service quality offered by all the three
marine parks, i.e. TIMP, RIMP and PIMP. Overall, all the marine parks are important and satisfYing. Nonetheless, there is a difference between the mean values in the gap analysis and the paired t-test
Gap analysis shows that the mean values for most ofthe environmental service quality under study are negative for TIMP, but positive for RIMP, PIMP and for the overall marine parks. This indicates
that when the three marine parks are evaluated separately, tourist satisfaction differs. However, in general, most ofthe tourists are satisfied with the environmental services offered The tourist overall
satisfaction index shows that the highest satisfaction goes to RIMP at 86.8 percent, followed byTIMP at 70.3 percent and PIMP at 67.0 percent.
